Module 1 Assignments
Read
- Genesis 1-25:10 (Creation through the account of Abraham)
- Creation, the Patriarchs, and Babylon (1:1-11:26)
- The account of Abraham (11:27-25:10)
- Alexander, From Paradise to the Promised Land
- "An Overview of the Pentateuch," pp. 3-8
- "Introduction to Pentateuchal Criticism," pp. 229-232
Engage
- Describe in your own words what the term "Biblical criticism" means. Do you think it is important to know about this as a Christian and student of the Bible? Explain.
- Consider this passage:
We believe that it is evident in reading the Pentateuch that its broad stretches of narrative, spanning the time from Creation to the covenant at Sinai and, further, to the conquest of Canaan, cannot conveniently be broken down into the 'books' of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Dueteronomy as we now have them in our bibles. There is an appreciable loss of sense when we view the Genesis narratives without following them all the way to Sinai and the conquest. There is an even greater loss when we attempt to read the exodus, wilderness, and conquest narratives apart from those in Genesis. By reading the narratives in Exodus in isolation from those in Genesis, for example, we can easily overlook the author's attempts to link God's work of Creation in the beginning with his work of covenant at Sinai. We fail to see the tabernacle as the author's view of a return to the Garden of Eden, or the crossing of the Red Sea as a retelling of God's great work of judgement and redemption in the Flood. Moreover, if we read the collections of laws in Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronmy apart from their context within the overall pentateuchal narrative, we can easily fail to appreciate the many and varied links between these laws and their narrative framework.
Does this position seem consistent with what you have read so far in Alexander's book? Is this the way you have understood the relationship of the "books" within the Pentateuch? If not, how so? What factors are in play that may hinder such an approach/attitude toward understanding the Pentateuch, indeed, the entire Bible?John H. Sailhamer, The Pentateuch as Narrative, p. xix - Can the Bible be described as divine literary art? How does this characterization strike you? E.M. Good pleads for a deepening of our appreciation for the literary value of Scripture: "We have been so eager to interpret the Bible that we have sometimes forgotten to read it, to read it in the same way we read The Divine Comedy (Dante), for example, or Othello (Shakespeare), or The Waste Land (T.S. Elliot)." Stephen Dempster contends that "ignorance of [the Bible's] literary features impedes understanding." Is something missing along these lines in our approach to Scripture?